Which case law states that RADAR does not warrant a search?

Prepare for the Speed Detection Operator Exam. Study with flashcards and multiple choice questions, each question includes hints and explanations. Get ready for your certification!

The case law that highlights that RADAR does not warrant a search is Wiggins v. State. This ruling clarifies that the use of RADAR technology for speed detection is considered a reasonable method of gathering evidence without requiring a search warrant. The court's decision emphasizes that because RADAR does not involve any physical intrusion or observation beyond what is already visible to the public, it does not infringe upon an individual's expectation of privacy. As a result, law enforcement can utilize RADAR devices to detect speed violations without needing to obtain a warrant beforehand, making this a significant legal precedent in the context of speed enforcement.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy